Plagiarism Policy

P-ISSN: 3117-3284 E-ISSN: 3117-3292
Plagiarism & Text Recycling Policy

Believers Journal of Health Sciences (BJHS) is committed to protecting academic integrity and the absolute originality of published research. The journal does not accept plagiarism, self-plagiarism, duplicate submission, redundant publication, unattributed translation, or any other form of improper use of another person's work, ideas, data, images, or intellectual contribution. All submitted manuscripts must be original, properly referenced, and prepared in accordance with standard rules of scholarly publishing.

Defining Plagiarism & Overlap Types

Plagiarism includes presenting another person's core data, words, results, or methods as one's own, specifically covering:

• Copying text without quotation marks or citations
• Paraphrasing another author's text too closely
• Reusing research figures/tools without permission
• Translating previously published papers without disclosure
• Undisclosed reuse of one's own past published text
• Submitting a manuscript to multiple journals at once
• Republishing previously indexed datasets or analysis profiles as entirely new work
Similarity Screening Principles

All submissions undergo regular algorithmic similarity checking. Note that similarity reports serve as a screening tool; a specific percentage score alone does not determine manuscript rejection. The editorial team analyzes context, citation accuracy, and material source. Properly cited quotes, standard methodological blocks, or legally mandated texts producing matches do not constitute plagiarism.

Self-Plagiarism, Text Recycling & Redundancy

Authors can build upon their prior literature only if the baseline source is explicitly cited and the new draft introduces a substantial original contribution. Undisclosed recycling of data, results, or conclusions is prohibited. Submitting identical manuscripts simultaneously to multiple entities is barred. Authors must state if parts overlap with prior conference abstracts, preprints, theses, or technical reports.

Generative AI Misconduct Rules

Generative artificial intelligence platforms must never be deployed to copy, paraphrase, fabricate, or disguise plagiarized content. Authors are fully accountable for ensuring AI-assisted translations, text segments, or data tables remain authentic and cited correctly. AI-generated citations must be manually verified; fabricated references represent severe integrity failures.

Pre & Post-Publication Editorial Actions

Before Publication: Minor overlaps require author revision. Serious plagiarism, data falsification, or duplicate submission results in immediate rejection without peer review, accompanied by potential future submission bans.

After Publication: If plagiarism is verified post-launch, BJHS coordinates corrective notices—including Corrections, Clarifications, Expressions of Concern, or permanent Retractions. The office systematically updates indexing metadata networks to alert abstracting databases.

Author Commitments & Appeals Process

Authors guarantee that submitted materials are new, citations are precise, direct quotes map to quotation marks, and permissions are logged for copyrighted visual structures. If a submission faces desk rejection or a post-publication notice due to overlap, authors can submit a written appeal detailing factual or procedural errors. Appeals are evaluated by an independent editor not associated with the baseline choice loop.

Commitment to Global Ethical Scholarship Standards
BJHS expects all author groups, external reviewers, handling editors, and desk staff to uphold clean citation metrics, transparent data declarations, and original open scholarship. Policy parameters undergo continuous evaluation to mirror current international publication ethics and COPE compliance standards.